Here's yet another:
Editorial Reviews
Book Description
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been
criticized by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental
traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers
who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this
volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its
contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept
of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics.
Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshornes crucial
distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables
neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar
criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to
concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the
traditional concept of God as static.
About the Author
Daniel A. Dombrowski is Professor of Philosophy at Seattle University. He is
the author of fourteen books and over one hundred scholarly articles, and has
written broadly in the area of process or neoclassical theism.
---------------------------------
Product Details
Hardcover: 180 pages
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (May 29, 2006)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0521863694
ISBN-13: 978-0521863698
Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DORE'S ARGUMENT
(1) I forgot to take my meds.
(2) Therefore, I AM CHRIST!!
(3) Therefore, God exists.
ARGUMENT FROM MANIFESTATIONS
(1) If you turn your head sideways and squint a little, you can see an image of
a bearded face in that tortilla.
(2) Therefore, God exists.
#551 is pretty good too!
Hundreds of Proofs of God's Existence
---------------------------------
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
