> > ...surely there's a defintion of what TM is and what > > a TMer is - it's just common sense, that you'd define > > what it is that you're talking about, so we could agree > > on some basics. That's my point, but nobody seems to be > able to say what, exactly, a TMer is supposed to be. > > And who gets to pronounce who is and who isn't a TMer > > anyway? > > peterklutz wrote: > You have already given a clear definition of what a TMer > is. > > Twice. > Regressus ad absurdam. Saying that a TMer is somone who practices TM is circular logic. What, exactly, is TM, Peter? It's a very simple question. Why is it so difficult for you to give me a simple answer? I can see now why you got kicked off Wiki - you can't even define basics.
And who gets to pronounce who is and who isn't a TMer anyway?
