> Would you be willing to be the one they report it > to? And really, the > problem is not quantity but quality, isn't it? But > perhaps the two are > connected.
Rick, I'm fine with putting someone on moderation who posts too many times in one day, as long as someone takes the time to report it first. Some of these large posters are on block and I'm not going to change that just now to start counting their posts. --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of gullible fool > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but > maybe I had something to do > with FFL going pearshaped > > > > > > But again, someone would > > have to spend a lot of > > time monitoring and counting posts > > Rick, we already have subscribers who would love to > do > some of the monitoring. No one needs to count all of > the posts by all of the posters daily, but if an > AMTer > goes over the daily limit, someone will be eager to > report it. > > Would you be willing to be the one they report it > to? And really, the > problem is not quantity but quality, isn't it? But > perhaps the two are > connected. If there were a limit on the number of > posts people could make, > they would take care to write quality posts. So > that's one possibility - > place a quota on posting if someone is willing to > monitor it and change the > status of offenders. The other is to monitor those > who bicker with one > another. Any takers? > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
