--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of authfriend > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:21 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] *ATTACK* (was Lawson's Adieu (was Re: Breaking > News) > > > > In this new regime, if someone has unsubscribed > from the group, are personal attacks on them > permitted because they're no longer around to > read and respond to them? > > Probably they should be, but do you regard this as a personal > attack? If someone told me I was being defensive, I wouldn't > feel attacked. If they called me dirty or insulting names, I > would be.
Ah, OK. Well, this gives us the beginning of an idea of what's to be permitted and what isn't. Certainly, eliminating all the posts that call people dirty and insulting names will make a huge difference in the atmosphere here. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > LOL, I guess he never realized that people were simply being > > *realistic*. > > > > Probably best he left if he felt so defensive he could not get that. > > > > > > On Mar 19, 2007, at 8:29 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "llundrub" <llundrub@> > wrote: > > >> > > >> How did that happen. > > > > > > I found this in my inbox this morning from Lawson: > > > > > > > > > Hey Judy, > > > > > > Yeah, I felt kinda singled out about the number-of-postings > issue. I > > > sent a "fairwell, it's been fun" message, and then quit the group > > > before my message percolated through the Yahoo mail system (Yahoo > > > group messages sent via the online interface apparently send > emails > > > to the Yahoo group server) so it was rejected because I was not a > > > member of FFL and couldn't post messages. > > > > > > I think everyone on the "anti" side is rather distressed right > now, > > > due to the increased publicity on TM, and the ongoing Invicible > > > America project, not to mention that pundits are finally arriving. > > > Aside from MMY allegedly not keeping his dick in his dhoti, they > have > > > little to bash the TMO about these days, so they take it out on TM > > > supporters that dare show their faces. > > > > > > Ah well, even so, Paul Mason found FFL too pro-TM so he high- > tailed > > > it back to the TMFree blog, so I guess one man's excessively- > biased- > > > in-one-direction forum can be perceived as excessively biased in > the > > > other, depending where you fall on the scale of bias. > > > > > > Enjoy FFL and whatnot. Say hi and bye to everyone and explain what > > > happened. I didn't leave without warning. You can even post this > > > message to the group if you like. > > > > > > Later, > > > > > > Lawson > > >
