Nonsense Rick, you're being too nice and too permissive. If they have a personal question about these limits, have them send it to you directly. If they feel they have to go to the 'whole list', count it agin them. They are playing you off with this 'attack' crap. It is just more of the same.
-Doug --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of TurquoiseB > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] 4 Post Notice (was Re: ++Attack++) > > Bottom line is that if the limit is set at a fixed > five posts per day, EVERYONE will have to stop and > *think* before they press Send. They'll have to say > to themselves, "Self, do I *really* want to waste > one of my five posts a day on this crap?" If one > allows all sorts of "exceptions" to the rule, the > answer they come up with is all too often going to > be, "Why YES, I *do* want to make this petty post, > because it doesn't "count" against my limit." If > the policy allows NO exceptions, the answer is > more likely to be, "NO, I don't want to waste one > of my five posts on this issue. I will save my > energies (and my posts) for something more > substantive." And isn't that exactly what the > new policy is supposed to be all about? > > Good points. Let's compromise and say that today only, a few clarification > posts will not be counted against one's total, but after today, they will. >
