--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" 
> <willytex@> wrote:
> >
> > Rick Archer wrote:
> > > I think at this point blatant offensive personal attacks 
> > > would warrant  moderation.
> > >
> > Mr. Archer - This was a blatant and unwarranted personal attack 
on 
> me by Mr. Stanley. My 
> > name is not "willytex" - I already told him that. My name is 
> Richard J. Williams. 
> > 
> > What kind of moderator is it that sets up rules to prevent 
personal 
> attacks and then turns 
> > around and attacks the person who is notifying him of a personal 
> attack? 
> > 
> > My post entitled ++Attack++ was not "incoherent gibberish". 
> > 
> > This is pathetic - a moderator who doesn't even read a message 
that 
> notifies him of a 
> > personal attack and then has the nerve to denigrate the 
complainer,
> > 
> > Mr. Stanley should be unsubscribed to this forum for posting a 
> personal attack - I am 
> > offended. In my opinion, Mr. Stanley owes me an apology and you, 
> Sir, owe me an 
> > explanation. Otherwise, I must assume that you and Mr. Stanley 
are 
> not worthy of further 
> > dialog.
> 
> 
> This is rather funny. We somehow finally limit a few fools to 5 
posts 
> a day. Then what happens ? This place is swarmed by even greater 
> argumentative fools. Whats wrong with having a 1 post limit pr 
day ?
> 
> As I have said before; FFL is and will continue to be a Fools 
> Paradise.
> 
> (I liked Jims article on his personal journey though. Good timing 
> Jim !)
>
Glad you liked it! I am enjoying it as well-- I am enjoying this 
policy of five posts a day, too. 

Reply via email to