--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > Rick Archer wrote: > > > I think at this point blatant offensive personal attacks > > > would warrant moderation. > > > > > Mr. Archer - This was a blatant and unwarranted personal attack on > me by Mr. Stanley. My > > name is not "willytex" - I already told him that. My name is > Richard J. Williams. > > > > What kind of moderator is it that sets up rules to prevent personal > attacks and then turns > > around and attacks the person who is notifying him of a personal > attack? > > > > My post entitled ++Attack++ was not "incoherent gibberish". > > > > This is pathetic - a moderator who doesn't even read a message that > notifies him of a > > personal attack and then has the nerve to denigrate the complainer, > > > > Mr. Stanley should be unsubscribed to this forum for posting a > personal attack - I am > > offended. In my opinion, Mr. Stanley owes me an apology and you, > Sir, owe me an > > explanation. Otherwise, I must assume that you and Mr. Stanley are > not worthy of further > > dialog. > > > This is rather funny. We somehow finally limit a few fools to 5 posts > a day. Then what happens ? This place is swarmed by even greater > argumentative fools. Whats wrong with having a 1 post limit pr day ? > > As I have said before; FFL is and will continue to be a Fools > Paradise. > > (I liked Jims article on his personal journey though. Good timing > Jim !) > Glad you liked it! I am enjoying it as well-- I am enjoying this policy of five posts a day, too.
