---Vaj, you have your head up your rectum. (and so does Sam Harris). Here's his latest article: http://www.tinyurl.com/2ctd39
In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, I noticed you switch between multiple names to continue posting > numbers low: matrixmonitor, coshlnx, hyperbolic geometry, etc. , etc. > I feel that should be illegal. It's dishonest. > > > On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:30 PM, coshlnx wrote: > > > ---We've gone over this before, dead horse. All depends on how you > > defdefine "Enlightenment". > > > > In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Marek Reavis wrote: > >> > >>> Here's a couple of my pennies on the above subject (and thanks to > >>> everyone who has weighed in on it). As many others have pointed out > >>> before, "Realization" implies that whatever It Is, It *already* Is > >>> and at some point It recognizes That. > >> > >> > >> There's also a pervasive sense, on recognition of the nondual, that > >> it was always this way. > >> > >> And of course, if it has a beginning in time, it is not nondual. ;-) > >> > >> The Buddha's first words after nirvana: 'we're all already > > enlightened.' > >> > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
