--- In [email protected], "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> Judy, I am happy to not understand. Barry however, does
> honestly contribute, and I don't see anything in his
> demeaner besides some smugness that warranted the ten
> year assault against him from the Lawson Judy team.

Perhaps that's because you have been happy not to
understand me when I've pointed out what in his
demeanor warrants the "assault" against him.

> Honestly, they are the two main reasons this group
> went to shit. Those are the two who have rattled
> this group without adding the slightest value for
> content.

See, in my view Lawson has added more valuable
content here than, for example, you, by a factor
of at least ten.  Different strokes for different
folks.  But I've never attacked you for what I
perceive as the low value of your posts.

 Just because someone copies some 
> interesting tidbit from the net doesn't make them a
> netizen.

Do you really believe all Lawson and I have contributed
here is attacks on Barry and interesting tidbits from
the net?

<snip>
> Judy, your continued attacks on Barry have made me
> really not like you.

This is so totally clueless it boggles the mind.
You have every right in the world not to like me,
Llun, but it's simply astounding you could have
gotten the professed reasons for your dislike so
utterly backward.

Barry was attacking me *before I even got here*--
as you'll recall if you think for a moment, because
you helped him out--and those attacks have continued
unabated ever since, most of them gratuitous.

My "sin," for the most part, has been in responding
to them and pointing out how dishonest and
hypocritical they were.  *You* try being the target
of such attacks day after day after day and see if
you can keep your mouth shut.

Get real, for pete's sake.


Reply via email to