matrixmonitor wrote: > I said that the person in question (named below); > was a. a barber, > Only licensed barbers can call themselves barbers, otherwise they are just hair cutters. So what?
> and that b. he told me that he witnessed MMY in a > sexual embrace with a female, > He was probably lying since the Maharishi has never embraced a female since he became a Brahmacharya in 1942. Now who would you trust? A very large group of people, standing on the corner, who all said they never saw a big blue bus pass by. Or, a very small group of people, standing on the same corner, who said they saw a big blue bus pass by. Or, a guy on standing on the same street corner, trying to pass himself off as a barber, who said he once saw a big blue bus pass by with a female inside hugging a scribe in a white dhoti. > as he (the barber) was walking by MMY's room which > happened be slightly open, enough to view the > goings-on inside. > It has already been established that Maharishi's bedroom had no doors and that Ms Pitman was guarding the doorway. So, how could the hair cutter peek in with Ms Pitman and Nandi Keshore blocking the doorway? And what was the hair cutter doing walking around in the middle of the night peeping into other people's bedrooms when he already had a female in his own room to peep at? > He didn't mention the age of the female. > Maybe so, but the average age of all the women on Rishikesh TTC was age sixty and Doris Duke was probably older than that. Apparently Prudence was the only single female and she didn't want to come out and play. So, you're thinking that the Maharishi wanted to get into bed with Doris Duke in front of a hair cutter? That's really a dumb story, in my opinion. > Stop conflating the issues! > Is that a rule on this forum? If, so try telling that to the moderator. He already implied that Judy was a Junkyard Dog and in the process hurt his foot by sticking in his big pie hole. > The person in question was a BARBER, and he cut > MMY's hair in that capacity. > But it is a fact that the Maharishi has never had his hair cut since 1942 since he became a Brahmacharya. It's obvious that the Maharishi has never had his beard cut off either. Can you produce a photo of the Maharishi with no hair or beard? I think not. So, the fact is that the Maharishi doesn't have any need of a hair cutter. You're probably thinking that the Maharishi still has a hair cutter, even though the Maharishi is clearly bald these days. Go figure. > However, he may ALSO have been a hairdresser > since he was an expert in the field, but did NOT > cut or primp MMY's hair in that capacity. > Maybe, so whose hair did he primp, and for what purpose would he primping anyone's hair? I mean, it's not like they really had anywhere to go except maybe to the canteen to eat some boiled vegetables. Nandi Keshore was bald, so he didn't need any hair primping. Mike Love was bald, so he didn't have any need for a primper. John, Paul, George, and Ringo sure did'nt get primped! Except later, John got primped real good by Yoko. > Therefore, he was MMY's barber and not MMY's > hairdresser; although the person in question > ALSO was an expert hairdresser. > It has not been established that he was a barber or that he was an expert in anything except spreading rumors about other people's peivate sex life, or lack thereof. If the so-called expert primper was a primper of the Maharishi's hair, then I'd say he really sucked as a primper! But, just for the record, I'd say that the Maharishi should have had a barber on staff, and he should have had his pate shaved clean. That way, he wouldn't look so bald now that he's ninety years old - we would all be used to seeing his tome shine in the glare of the TV lights. > As to Jerry's level of baldness and when exactly, > he transited from the state of having hair, to > the state of being "bald", since this is a rather > continuous progression; it would be difficult to > pin down an exact date and time at which he became > "bald". > Jerry Jarvis began to go bald on January 2, 1961, at 6:10 PM, when he was a gardener by trade. Debbie told me so. > At any rate, if you have any further questions > about Jerry's quantity of hair or lack thereof, > feel free to write him at: > PO BOX 4052, > Malibu, CA 90264. > Why don't YOU ask him about the Maharishi embracing female students - I'm sure that would be news to Jerry. While you're at it, why don't you tell Jerry your real name so he can mark you down as a misfit spreader of false rumors about the Maharishi. Thanks anyway for the information, but I'd prefer just having William G. Murphy drive over and ask Jerry in person about his hair. > Feel free to ask him if MMY had a barber; and > while you're at it, ask him the exact date he > became "bald". That should satisfy you, once > and for all. > No it won't - I won't be satisfied until you creeps stop spreading false rumors on the Internet about the Maharishi's private sex life. Maybe you need to mind your own business.
