--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Saying that "God is love" is not the complete definition > of the word "God" or there would not be two different words. > No need for a straw man.
The idea that a religious person must have a "complete definition of God" is the straw man. You and Harris want to impose on Sullivan beliefs about God *you believe* a religious person should hold. And amazingly enough, those beliefs just happen to be conveniently easy to refute. It's a neat racket. It's also profoundly intellectually dishonest. Basta.
