--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<snip>
> Possibly, some on the team could be overly sensitive. Not
> being an Imus fan myself, I do know he makes comments like
> these all the time, it's his job, he was hired as a shock
> jock and nobody takes him seriously.

Or maybe, a lot of people have been finding him
offensive for a long time, and this was the last
straw.

See, it wasn't just the women who were offended.

> My take on his  
> comments was that he was actually paying them a complement,
> Ghetto style, and it backfired. Tattooed, nappy headed, ho's
> sounds like a tuff bunch of girls, playing a tuff game.

Oh, please.  "Hos" isn't a compliment, even ghetto-style.

> I think the girls were pushed into this mess by powers  
> greater than themselves to meet a political agenda.

*What* political agenda?  Imus is an equal-
opportunity offender.  People across the country
were up in arms before any of the political people
spoke up.

> If any of the girls were  
> truly offended, it was appropriate for Imus to apologies
> to them, not to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and grovel
> at their feet.

I don't think Imus groveled at Sharpton's or
Jackson's feet, but he didn't need to go on
Sharpton's show. I agree with you on that point,
at least.

> Yes, Imus said  something 
> that most people would consider mean spirited, although I
> don't believe he intended it to be mean and hurtful and
> he has been pounded for  it and feels bad it was taken as
> it was, but NBC and CBS hired the guy to say  these very 
> things because his fans liked it and so did his sponsors
> until they were threatened with boycotts.

One of the first to pull out was American Express,
at the behest of its CEO, who is black.

Yes, Imus was hired to say outrageous things, but
this was obviously over the top.  He wasn't hired
to gratuitously insult people who aren't public
figures and haven't done the slightest thing to
deserve it.

I don't think you realize how widespread and
spontaneous the outrage was, including from the
sponsors. I haven't heard of any boycott threats.
No doubt they would have come in time if the
sponsors hadn't pulled out so quickly and MSNBC
and CBS hadn't taken action, but they hadn't
really gotten started yet.

 There are attorneys that say Imus has an  excellent case 
> against NBC and CBS for breach of contract. They hired
> him knowing he says these things on a regular basis

Yeah, he hadn't said *this* kind of thing on a
regular basis. This was beyond the pale because of
who the targets were.

 and it gave the broadcasting  companies good 
> ratings and now they decide to fire him while under
> political  pressure. There are those that think the
> Clinton's are behind this

There are those who think the Clintons are behind
*everything*. What else is new? I take that about
as seriously as you take Imus.

 because Imus  hates Hillary
> and refers to her as the anti -Christ and says she'll never
> be invited on his show and all she would have to do is give
> the Rev Al a call to start the ball rolling while she screams
> *racism*  and demands his firing.

Sharpton picked up a ball that was already rolling
and ran with it.  He didn't need any encouragement
from Clinton.

And she didn't demand his firing, she just asked for
people to support the team.  She was late to the
party at that; her supporters had been criticizing her
for not speaking up a lot earlier.  It was a full week
before we heard a peep out of her.


Reply via email to