So if you are in "complete sympathy" with the TM org, why do you make so 
many posts comparing it to the Nazis?

--- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Nay Feste37, whoever you are, you read me entirely wrong.  I am in 
> complete sympathy and with great hope for Maharishi and the TMorg.   
> I am quite confident that the movement spokespeople could answer 
> anything that gets raised here.  Possibly are better off for the 
> doing of it with some transparency and honesty.  
> 
> Maharishi used to hammer us with,  "Questions are just the 
> opportunity to re-state the teaching, no matter what they are."   
> Clarifying what is going on with TB and the Mpundits is not beyond 
> their spokespeople, Chawkins or Roth to do.  I hear about this TB & 
> the Maharishi pundits from townie fathers, it is not a vacuum here at 
> all.  For all the good reasons of public interest mentioned in the 
> replies to this thread it is its own topic in town here now.
> 
> Seems there are TM'ers, TMTB'ers and now, …MPwTB ?
> 
> You are quick to anonymously ad hominid/personal attack people here 
> yet offer not much comment on what is being said here.  Anonymously 
> you lurk and endure with us as one of the few here writing who 
> represent and defend the TM movement in deed and style.  I like that 
> you are still here with us, it does show something about the nature 
> of the FF community.
> 
> As an anonymous TB'er here, in the safety of your anonymous style, 
> what do you think about how it is going for Maharishi and the 
> TM.org ?  What could you offer up about this? 
> 
> Like, that recurring question which in your state you seem to 
> beg, `what could Maharishi have done or said to bring more of the old 
> meditating community to the domes, to get those numbers up to 
> critical?  What do you think could be done to improve the situation 
> with the Movement here for Maharishi?  Ban Rick Archer from the 
> community for having created this FFL list?  Round up the FFL list or 
> at least its moderators as evil-doing anti-TM collaborators?  There 
> is lots you might suggest.  What would you think? 
> 
> With Kind Regards,
> 
> -Doug in FF 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> >
> > And don't you just love that, Doug! Gives you more ammunition for 
> your 
> > endless anti-TMO campaign. You must be delighted. Any rumor will 
> do, the 
> > worse the better!  (I don't see "pundit" mentioned anywhere in your 
> quote.) 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" 
> <dhamiltony2k5@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Word on the street, that TB has come along with some pundits.
> > > 
> > > Cautiously worded article:
> > > 
> > > "The Jefferson County Public Health Department and the Iowa 
> Department 
> > > of Public Health's Tuberculosis Control Program are continuing to 
> > > investigate TB cases in the county."
> > > 
> > > google:
> > > Fairfield Daily Ledger 
> > > 
> > > article:
> > > 
> > > http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?
> > > newsid=18207877&BRD=1142&PAG=461&dept_id=567522&rfi=6
> > > 
> > > For the complete article, see the Friday, April 13, 2007 
> Fairfield 
> > > Ledger
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to