--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Robert Gimbel" <babajii_99@> > wrote: > <snip> > > This is exactly what it is, or even could be framed in broader > > terms as 'Male Rage'...Because we are living in a time, which is > > feminizing everything, this male rage thing comes out of feeling > > powerless, castrated, confused, and just wanting to lash out. > > Oh, I'm sorry, but this is nonsense. "Male rage" > isn't a new development, nor has this culture become > "feminized." There have always been men who lashed > out violently because they felt powerless, castrated, > and confused; there have always been fathers who spoke > abusively to their daughters. > > What's *new* is that we hear about it more because > of the explosive expansion of electronics and the > media, not to mention the obsession with celebrity.
I never said this was a new developement: You can see in the Medieval Islamic countries, the rage against women; And now the rage against every living thing. What I was attempting to spark, was an awareness that woman don't need men anymore, to support them financially or emotionally for that matter. This is new. Rage is not a good thing, we all can agree on that- whoever is raging. It's a matter, of making a choice, to go with the rage, or not... To let it go(rage), to not justify it, but learn to let it go, and dissolve it before it causes harm. This is not an easy thing to do, and takes practice. But it seems to me, that rage begets more rage.
