IMHO, this site has been vastly improved by the five-post limit. It is now more readable, individual's ideas are easier to follow, and it has eliminated much of the annoying bickering. The only improvement I could suggest is a one-post-per-day limit. In this way, a person would really, really, really have to think about what they were posting.
A good solution for the postoholics would be to collect all of their responses for the day in one post, and then send it in at the end of the day as one big cathartic blast. Here's another idea: Remove the limit, but set up a charity organization, in which each person "voluntarily" (billed monthly) contributed $1.00 USD per post? Sort of like a walkathon...but more like a postathon. Tongue removed from cheek....that's not a bad idea! --- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Someone jokingly suggested we should make it an average of 5 posts a > day -- thus 35 a week or something. Hard to track and administer. > However, I find I barely have time to read a few posts during the > week, much less write many. However on the weekends, FFL and / or > other forums provide a valuable outlet and vista for me to get outside > the very focused (interesting but within a small channel of LIFE) > intellectual and other pursuits/demands in my career work. And to > think of broader issues that also nourish my life. > > As Barry has said, many write to discover. ...
