--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new.morning wrote:
> > Someone jokingly suggested we should make it an average of 5 
posts a
> > day -- thus 35 a week or something. Hard to track and administer.
> > However, I find I barely have time to read a few posts during the
> > week, much less write many. However on the weekends, FFL and / or
> > other forums provide a valuable outlet and vista for me to get 
outside
> > the very focused (interesting but within a small channel of LIFE)
> > intellectual and other pursuits/demands in my career work. And to
> > think of broader issues that also nourish my life. 
> >
> > As Barry has said, many write to discover. I have always found 
this. I
> > start to write -- to flesh out some seed response / idea, and 
often,
> > much to my total amazement, have written something different and 
more,
> > and for me something I needed to "hear". As if a muse (perhaps, a
> > drunken, playful, trickster, not always a smart or insightful 
muse) on
> > my shouder say, "listen up bubba and write this down, read it, 
study
> > it, and take heed!"
> >
> > (as Dr Pete scribbles in his note book, "hears voices, worse, 
responds
> > to them, worse yet, bores all of us with them, hmmm .. clearly
> > schzorphrenic, psychotic, narcissistic, anti-social and 
generally an
> > ass" :) ) [and can't spell big words well]
> >
> > Better yet, is when such meanderings (referring to mine, not Dr 
Petes,
> > though I like his meanderings too), invoke converstation. Like my
> > recent friendly and cross-supportive (IMV) give-and-take with 
Curtis.
> > Or Curtis' and Marek's recent dialoge (damn, this Curtis fellow 
seems
> > to often be at the core of good dialogues.)
> >
> > On weekends, I have some time (perhaps quite UNWELL spent) 
catching up
> > on posts, reflecting on these posts, writing/meandering, 
responding to
> > some -- and in the process discovering things I was unaware of 
in my
> > mind-- and if I am very lucky -- starting a good 
dialogue /productive
> > debate and friendly discussion. 
> >
> > Sometimes, following the flow of ideas (and we KNOW we have no 
control
> > over thoughts, they just BUBBLE up from the ABSOLUTE aka Quantum
> > Dynamical Vacuum State of All Possibilites) it takes more than 5 
posts
> > to even begin to embody them. Thus, at least on weekends, I am
> > suggesting, ne, even vigorously arguing that the 5 post limit is
> > anti-vedic, anti-spiritual, annti-satangic, and counter to the
> > ABSOLUTE Quantum Dynamical nature of the Vacuum State of All
> > Possibilites inherent in all of CREATION! <smirk>
> >
> > Thus I suggest, ne, strongly advocate, that periodically, one can
> > invoke the "Weekend Exception" to the five post rule. In other 
words,
> > if one posts only a few posts, or none, during the week, they 
can post
> > a few more than five on weekends if such are not argumentative,
> > stupid, insipid or factually bogus. I know that knocks most of my
> > posts out of contentions, but you get the point. It would 
eliminate
> > spraig-like 80/posts a days of unrestrainable obsesive posts 
(though
> > some wre quite good). And it would disallow vindictive, 
arguative,
> > baiting slugs fests by, you know, "some people" and people who 
lightly
> > veil others as "some people".  
> >
> > Rick has said he will support changes suggested by "the 
majority". But
> > who would ever give up one of their precious posts to advocate or
> > denounce the above. 
> >
> > Thus, I am invoking the mystical quantum ritam seer "secret" 
clause
> > deeply embedded in the FFL guidelines. I proclaim to KNOW, at the
> > level of all truth, as inherently true that the majority in FFL 
agree
> > with this reasonable weekend extension of the five post rule. And
> > unless a majority or members (over 500) explicity post their
> > objection, that we TRY, as in "Trial", this minor augmentation 
of the
> > Rick five-post fiat and see how it goes. If its abused, we can 
either
> > send the offender to the dome as a  re-education camp for 6 
months,
> > and/or give then hot oil bathis, or ignore them, or moderate 
them --
> > turnin off their posts util they say "I will no longer be a ass" 
ten
> > times, in sanskrit and their native language.  
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > And I claim this is a forum administrative piece and should not 
count
> > toards my five-limit. :)
> >
> >
> >   
> This 5 post thing is the result of a few folks who apparently have 
an 
> addiction to FFL and maybe afraid of losing their jobs because 
they 
> spent too much time here (and there were some who didn't have any 
jobs 
> too).  Then we have the folks who must be hungover and thought 
they were 
> posting to their blog and instead posted here.  Posting limits are 
> offensive and infantile.



Comment:  Obviously you feel that way about snipping as well.

lurk




 They are the sign of an unenlightened mind and 
> the sign of encroaching fascism in the world.  They are such a 
joke that 
> some friends at Wired are thinking of doing an article on this 
group.  :)
>


Reply via email to