--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy posted 10 times today
My bad, inadvertent. Went over by 2 without realizing it during the day Wednesday, planned to compensate by making only 3 posts on Thursday, then blew it that night by forgetting Thursday begins at 1:00 am Eastern rather than midnight, posting-limit-wise. <snip> > Even though everyone but New Morning is > opposed to it, I'm seriously thinking of > trying the 35 posts-per-week system. I'm in favor of this, actually. <snip> > I overpost myself some days, and other days > don't post at all. So this way I wouldn't > violate a rule I'm supposed to enforce. You shouldn't be counting this kind of post in your own total, IMHO. If we try this, we'll start it Friday night > at midnight, so weekend warriors will have > free reign. My email client (Outlook) shows > me the total of posts, if I sort by posters' > names, so it won't be hard for me to keep > track of. Don't know if this is any easier, but you can also keep track by using the Yahoo search feature on the Web. ============================================== --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > I think it's a great idea. My guess is, Judy and her latest > sidekick, Jim, will keep trying to start arguments with > whomoever's convenient Says Sal, trying to start an argument. in the hopes that you will be forced > to agree that the limits don't work (doesn't abolish the > fighting,) and therefore give up. Unsurprisingly, Sal has completely failed to notice that it has not been Judy or Jim (who is hardly my "sidekick") who has been *starting* the arguments, just as it has not been in the past. Posting limits, in fact, *do not* abolish fighting. The only thing that will abolish fighting is to prohibit gratuitous attacks (such as yours in this post).
