On May 6, 2007, at 11:22 AM, authfriend wrote: > Well, it's a good thing you aren't drawing any > conclusions from this, Sal. > > You didn't actually *read the posts*, did you? > > Because if you had, you'd have discovered that by > *far* the majority of my posts with the word "liar" > in them, for example, are either quoting someone else > using the word or defending somebody else from the > charge of being a liar.
I figured this would be your standard line of defense, Judy, since taking any responsibility for your own words seems to be very difficult. Of course, many of the posts of the others I cited (including my own) are simply quoting *you,* which you conveniently left out. > This is based, admittedly, on a relatively small > sample, the first 20 of the 137 Sal cites. Of that > first 20 (15% of 137), in exactly 3 did I actually > call someone a liar (15% of 20). Extrapolating, > that would mean I've left 21 posts in which I called > someone a liar. > > I'd be willing to bet that of this 21, the vast > majority would be accusations directed at Barry > (and for good reason). But of course.
