--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> I agree with alex. If someone blatantly continues to violate 
concensus
> rules, why waste time "administering" to their rudeness. Three 
strikes
> and you are out.



Why bother invoking "rules" to get me out, new.morning?

If you don't want me here, just have the balls to say it.  And if 
enough people don't want me here, I'll just leave.






> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley"
> <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" 
> > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
<shempmcgurk@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post 
a day 
> > > rule 
> > > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and 
expression was 
> > > > > visited upon us.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week 
rule.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let's get back to the way it was.  Yes, the price that we 
may 
> > > have to 
> > > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts 
a day 
> > > but 
> > > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you 
to 
> > > skim 
> > > > > over his name in the message list and you're done!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 
posts a 
> > > day 
> > > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm precious.
> > > > 
> > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to 
abide 
> > > by
> > > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of 
how many
> > > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up 
to Rick
> > > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. 
Personally, 
> > > I
> > > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because 
enforcing 
> > > it
> > > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would 
be my
> > > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and 
then
> > > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Fuck you, Adolf.
> > 
> > Grow the hell up you spineless anonymous baby.
> >
>


Reply via email to