--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess we have to admit that understanding each other, and feeling > understood by each other, is not one of our options Judy. I don't > doubt that I contribute to the weirdness of it all. I think there is > a fundamental lack of trust and rapport that makes real communication > possible. It certainly hasn't been from a lack of effort on either > side. But we just can't get there from here.
Cop-out. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > She's not worth the "dialog" Curtis. And the idea of this big tub of > > > > condescending snarkiness having a "belly laugh" or a "horselaugh" is > > > > extremely unappealing under any circumstances. > > > > > > Thanks Geezer. The whole victim projection is one of moves that > > > people try to impose to make my leaving the movement into an > > > emotional reaction rather than an intellectual choice. I have > > > only heard it about one hundred times. > > > > And therefore you "hear" it *every* time, even > > when the person is saying something quite > > different. > > > > I did NOT suggest your leaving the movement > > was an emotional reaction rather than an > > intellectual choice. > > > > Now, what do you suppose I *did* say? And why > > do you suppose you turned it into something > > else? > > > > You've misconstrued just about everything I've > > said in this thread, inadvertently or otherwise. > > You can't even admit you were the first to get > > hostile when the evidence that was the case is > > clear as it could possibly be. > > > > When you're challenged, Curtis, you tend to go > > into *massive* denial. > > >
