--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "claudiouk" <claudiouk@> wrote:". . . amazing how the mere act of
> observation can alter outcomes in quantum experiments."
> 
> Hmmm, I'm thinking that "observation" as defined in today's physics is
> actually not such.  It's not witnessing that changes the observed,
> it's the throwing of objects at the observed that skew measurements of
> it.  That's interfering physically -- not merely absorbing quanta
> radiating off the object.
<snip>

This is an interesting point -- for me, observing is not passive 
absorption, but actually *does* entail an active emanation from within 
to enliven the object(s) perceived. I hadn't considered the quantum 
analogies to this before; many thanks.

Reply via email to