--- In [email protected], "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of off_world_beings > > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:46 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My response to a friend's suggestion > that we > > engage in a discussion about the movement > > > > > > > > Lol, the guy is right Rick. You are already set in your conclusions, > > and have fundamentalist beliefs based on heresay and gossip. Your > > letter to him shows a complete stagnancy of thinking on the topic. > > That does not mean the other side is not the same. It could be. > > But your problem is this Rick. Research published in peer- reviewed > > scientific journals, decade after decade, wins hands down over > > gossip and ill-supported conspiracy theories. Good luck wit' that > > bud. > > > > What's with this journal obsession? I have no problem with the > research. It > > shows TM is effective and many ways. I don't dispute that. What I do > is take > > ALL available information, throw it in the pot, and try to make a > palatable > > stew of it. The more controversial things I have come to believe, > based on > > evidence I find credible, do not negate the many positive things > about TM, > > MMY, etc. For me, reconciling them just presents an interesting > challenge. > > > First of all scientific research doesn't prove anything about TM, with > the possible exception that it's good for high blood pressure. >>
Nonsense. You are making things up to suit your unscientific agenda. OffWorld
