--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of off_world_beings > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My response to a friend's suggestion that we > engage in a discussion about the movement > > > > Lol, the guy is right Rick. You are already set in your conclusions, > and have fundamentalist beliefs based on heresay and gossip. Your > letter to him shows a complete stagnancy of thinking on the topic. > That does not mean the other side is not the same. It could be. > But your problem is this Rick. Research published in peer-reviewed > scientific journals, decade after decade, wins hands down over > gossip and ill-supported conspiracy theories. Good luck wit' that > bud. > > What's with this journal obsession? I have no problem with the research. It > shows TM is effective and many ways. I don't dispute that. >>
And that is all that counts. Humans have no other way to agree on things. What you are advocating is a GW BUsh approach, which takes action based on personal opinion, heresay, and prejudice. That is called the Dark Ages. You and Bush will not take us back to the darjk ages,. Science and reason will be victorious. Period. <<What I do is take > ALL available information, throw it in the pot, and try to make a palatable > stew of it.>> Lol, Good luck wit' that. << The more controversial things I have come to believe, based on > evidence I find credible, do not negate the many positive things about TM, > MMY, etc. For me, reconciling them just presents an interesting challenge.>> Yes , a lot of people like conspiracy theories. It is very common challenge for many minds. OffWorld
