--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 11:57 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Message from Ron > > > > Is this the same "Ron" who was a fanatical, abrasive, pro-TM, TM-is- > > the-best, anti-everyone-else's-system TMer? Or is it another Ron? > > > > Same Ron, but he appears to have mellowed a lot. > > What is shocking is that he appears to have left Maharishi for a new > Guru. It doesn't sound like the same Ron, although I read only a very > small amount of the exchange. His postings used to be straight TM > dogma. At least it doesn't appear that he is prostelitizing for Guru > G. Only thing worse than spouting dogma about something, is finding a > new cause and then spouting that new dogma, saying the old dogma > suddenly became obsolete. > > He seems very balanced, sensible, and much more mature as a spiritual > aspirant. And his writing style has improved dramatically. But I assure you, > it's the same guy. >
Transfinite Ron has evolved to a plane of yet higher cardinality: Message 33361 of 33523 From: "at_man_and_brahman" Date: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:15 am Subject: an offer that can't be refused --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The thing is there is no satisfaction of a deep > and lasting nature on the level of logic, it is > not a problem which has its solution on this > level, it is a spiritual problem which has the > solution on the level of consciousness. This is > not a vague statement, it is something I can > elaborate on forever if requested. > I think that I speak for all of FFL in urging you, pleading with you from the bottom of our hridayams, to elaborate on this very point forever, starting now, either in one infinitely long post or in an infinite series of finite posts or in an infinite series of infinitely long posts. We, of course, won't be around to read much of what you'll say, and the Internet won't be a suitable medium for your commentary for very long*, but those are mere details to be worked out. The ages of Mother Divine will come and go as fireflies in the twilight as your commentary expands beyond all limits that only she can conceive. The Ved itself will be exposed as an infinitesimally puny subset of your commentary, a trifling imposter in the fullness of Ronology. Go, Ron. Start now. We'll stick around for as much as we can, and we'll encourage our descendents to follow the thread for as long as possible*. *The infinite series of finite posts is probably best given the eventual demise of the Internet. As this technology, or later this planet, comes to an end, the discontinuities inherent in posts of finite length, some of which can be arbitrarily brief, provide convenient stopping points for moving your commentary to a newer medium or planet or even universe as the need arises. If a single post were infinitely long, somewhere in its middle the Earth could be consumed by a nova-stage sol or intersecting cosmic string, for example, providing no node for you to find another planet from which to continue working. **For so long as our species stays attentive and continues to exist, or other intelligent species get and stay involved, you will probably want to make occasional shifts in the language of your commentary from early 21st century American English to newer forms of English and later languages. You might want to learn Sanskrit before you start the commentary. It is nature's language and should be so for the duration of your infinite project, but few beings will understand you, if that matters. As a professional proofreader, I'd be happy to proofread your commentary for the rest of my comparatively meaningless life. I charge by the hour.
