--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
<snip>
> Al Gore is, like his father before him, a fear-monger.  Al Senior 
> represented a Jim Crow state -- Tennessee -- for many years in the 
> Senate.  Al Senior was a supporter of segregation (he would never 
> have been elected if he didn't) throughout his entire Senate career 
> (he voted against the Civil Rights Act).

For the umpteenth time: No, Al Gore Sr. did
not support segregation. That is a right-
wing slander. You know this, because we've
talked about it before.

Just as a reminder--you've seen this already--
the following is from right-wing journalist
Bob Zelnick's critical 1999 biography of Al
Gore Jr., published by the right-wing Regnery
Press:

"The actions of Gore [Sr.], [Sen. Estes] Kefauver, and, at the state 
level, [Gov. Frank] Clement, and their courage and decency on the 
civil rights issue, would be more a source of political trouble than 
benefit in Tennessee, though none of the three ever lost an election 
because of his position, at least until Gore's defeat in his 1970 
campaign. Each reelection would be challenged and each man would be 
accused of being 'out of touch' with sentiment in the state, or worse 
yet, a traitor to his region, his heritage, and his people. None of 
the three ever backed down. None ever engaged in racial demagoguery. 
None would ever require sympathetic chroniclers to explain that his 
conduct had to be judged in the context of his time and its political 
exigencies. Their courage would inspire later generations of 
southerners who sought to purge the region of its terrible racial 
heritage."

And this is from a detailed study entitled
"13 Ways of Looking at Al Gore and Race" by
journalists David Maraniss and Ellen Nakashima,
published as the cover story of the April 23,
2000, Washington Post Sunday magazine:

"Long before Bill Clinton came along, [Vice President] Gore lived in 
the shadow of another dominant politician, his father. Many of the 
deepest tensions of American race relations were played out during 
the long career of Sen. Gore, whose opposition to the segregated ways 
of his native South angered many of his constituents and eventually 
led to his political demise. 

"With one notable exception, when he capitulated to regional 
sentiment and opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the choices he made 
over more than three decades in Washington were courageous--and they 
provided lasting lessons in the political education of his son....

"...[Sen. Gore] won reelection that fall [1964] and returned to 
Washington, where from then on he acted like an unflinching Southern 
progressive attuned to the needs of his black constituents. He voted 
for the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act, opposed 
President Nixon's two Southern nominees for the Supreme Court...and 
eventually apologized for his 1964 vote, calling it the biggest 
mistake of his career. All during that time he took a pounding from 
segregationists and real estate interests who opposed the open 
housing laws....

"As Sen. Gore became more outspoken on issues of race and peace over 
the next six years, his standing in Tennessee deteriorated, his 
liberal positions were portrayed as contrary to the state's values, 
and he was defeated in the 1970 election."

Gore's stated reason for voting against the
1964 Civil Rights Act was that he felt the
federal deadlines were too strict, and that
their enforcement would cause chaos in 
Tennessee's public services, including the
closure of hospitals and schools. He almost
certainly also realized he would lose the
1964 election if he voted for the act.

But he didn't vote against it because he
supported segregation--to the contrary.

The rest of your post about Gore Jr., and
his crusade against global warming, is no
more accurate than your slander of his father
as a segregationist.



Reply via email to