--No need to separate out one body from another.  It's a package deal.

- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> On May 28, 2007, at 11:50 AM, cardemaister wrote:
> 
> > > > On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
> > > > > > that the TM myth of physical stress release from the
> > > > > > physical nervous system was fallacious. Where stress is
> > > > > > being released is in the pranic body or vajra body. It is
> > > > > > the pranic body that evolves.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't understand the inconsistency between MMY's position,
> > > > > your's, and Muktananda's.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whether it's the "pranic body or vajra body" (although I'm 
not
> > > > > sure what "vajra body" is), isn't that still on the relative
> > > > > level? Whether it's actual physical body or subtle, the 
stress
> > > > > (or karma) is still stored there and has to be released.
> > > >
> > > > Karma is what tradition would state, not "stress".
> > >
> > > Actually, "stress" in MMY's lingo refers to samskaras,
> >
> > The word "saMskaara" is actually almost the "same" as
> > Sanskrit in, well, Sanskrit -- which is "saMskRta".
> > That word, "saM-s-kRta", consists of the perfect participle
> > of the root "kR" (to do, etc), with the prefix "sam"
> > (together, etc.), and a transition consonant, or perhaps,
> > as per Whitney, an original consonant that's lost from
> > most other forms of the root "kR", which would thus have
> > been originally *skR (in linguistics asterix is used to
> > indicate hypothetical word forms).
> > The word "saMskaara" differs from "saMskRta" in that
> > the second part is a noun, "kaara", from the same root "kR".
> 
> 
> If this is indeed what he's referring to, then please quote a 
source  
> showing the equivalency in MMB's own words.
> 
> If indeed it is, and I suspect you may be right, the mediator is  
> indeed the pranic body and it's karmic eddies not the physical  
> nervous system (as oft advertised in TMO tracts).
> 
> There may indeed be a physical component in the nervous system, 
e.g.  
> glia with an extremely short time span unmeasurable by current  
> medical imaging technology or some short biological half-life fast  
> neurotransmitters, but currently there is no tangible evidence to  
> definitely arrive at such a conclusion.
>


Reply via email to