Comment below:

**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> <snip>
>   IMO, the
> > posters here who are able to rise above having to
> > react angrily when someone portrays them in a diff-
> > erent way than they see themselves can do so because
> > they have a basic level of respect for the other
> > posters, and consider them their equals. "We're all
> > just seekers here," and all that. In general, those
> > who become indignant do so because they've been
> > insulted by someone they consider "lesser" than
> > themselves.
> 
> It's interesting, I have never, even for a second,
> thought of anyone on this forum--or anywhere else,
> for that matter--as "lesser" than myself.  That
> concept is just completely foreign to me and always
> has been, no matter how nastily they have insulted
> me (or someone else), no matter what kind of
> falsehoods the other person has told about me (or
> someone or something else), no matter how blatant
> the hypocrisy they indulge in.
> 
> It's curious that "some people" seem to see that
> kind of thinking in me and others when there's a 
> disagreement of some kind.
> 
> Especially in a post in which *they* clearly
> indicate that they believe their own purported
> egalitarianism makes them superior to those
> whom they believe perceive others to be inferior.
>
 **end**

But, Judy, can't you see that referring to certain people as nasty,
insulting, hypocritical liars might make them feel as if you're making
a value judgment?

Reply via email to