> > I think adhering to the 35 post limit would be more > > likely to happen if anything over 35 got deleted. > > Would you want to spend time composing posts that no > > one read? > > New wrote: > I suggest they be deleted, and the offending poster be > limited to 25 posts the next week or two. If they oofend > twice in a row(or amonth) then limit them to 15. etc. > > This approach tries to use the best of both Rick's idea > (limit the following week's posts) and gull's idea not > to cater to excesses. > Maye so, but what about the quality? And what about the news of Marshy's comings-and-goings? I get the impression from reading this forum that NOTHING much goes on in Fairfield.
Has any respondent actually been inside a Marshy Golden Dome lately? Or even on the MUM campus? Apparently Barry went to a flea market a few Sunday's ago and one morning he went to a sidewalk cafe for some latte. Judy must think that she's the only person here who reads the nrespapaper. Hey! Geezerfreak - why do all your messages begin with RE: and end on one line? As far as I'm concerned, almost ALL of the messages to this forum could be deleted, with the exception of Card, who seems to have a real interest in things Indian.
