--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > > I just watched it again, and this time I noticed > > > > something kind of sad: even in the second half, > > > > there aren't any paintings of women of color. Maybe > > > > a couple are, but they aren't obviously so. There > > > > are plenty the creator of the video could have > > > > chosen from. > > > > > > > eh- probably would've been a little jarring to morph that way. > > we'll > > > save that for Gaugin (sp?) version... > > > > Don't know why it would have been jarring. > > That guy could morph *anything*. I think it > > would have been a wonderful touch. As Larry > > said so beautifully, one woman with many > > faces. > > > Come to think of it, why not go all out and do a morph with all > living things included? Anything with a face anyway...
Unity Consciousness on YouTube! >
