--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
>
> Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
> inquire into and integrate our self-righteously scripted reactions
> around warmongers, liars, false gurus, misusers of power, etc.
("I'm
> better than so-and-so!") we see that after all we have been
indulging
> in the false-intellect, and have only been projecting our own
dramas
> onto the Emptiful perfection, withholding our all-inclusive Love
and
> superimposing an illusory snake upon an innocent string, and here
and
> now find that what had appeared to be "sin" only IS IS,
indescribable,
> radiantly beautiful, a perfect reflection of the Self -- as it has
> always been!
>
> Again, we've often found Byron Katie ("Loving what IS") to be very
> useful in helping the divisive mind to catch up with Us :-)
>
Hi, I agree with the ultimate perfection of what you have said here.
On the other hand I also enjoy the play of moving from that false-
intellect to the Real, again and again and again. There seems to be
a natural tendency when we challenge ourselves through new life
experience to initially recoil slightly at the inevitable expansion
of conciousness, waiting there in the wings to pounce, once we have
fully embraced that which we have boldly sought out. To find the
snake and magically transform it into a string is a beautiful
experience. To experience the radiant oneness and then deliberately
move beyond it into darkness, dawn, and then again into radiant
Light is the pure pleasure of this Life. The key appears to keep
moving, out of devotion. Don't sell out to a static Oneness, or a
backwards I-ness, but keep moving forward into the mutual embrace of
the unknown. Yo Yo Mah Ho-Mie! :-)
