--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to > be a > > > > > guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to > be a > > > > > guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are we about to step into nonsense here because if so it is going to > > > > be very short lived from this side. > > > > > > > > Go ahead and list the basis for claim that Swami G is not a Guru if > > > > you like, then maybe there will be a response. Keep in mind my > comment > > > > in an earlier post, if it is thought that a post coming from > Swami G > > > > will be of no value, most likely there is not going to be one. I > > > > haven't seen it happen too often but I have seen it. > > > > > > > > You can see Swami G tell of her journey and how it is that she > became > > > > a Guru in one of the 13 youtube videos under the search of > Guruswamig > > > > > > > > > Your guru comes off to me like any other common person who has their > > > own opinions. In the video I saw of her, she seems like any regular > > > woman who attended some metaphysical classes and offers her point of > > > view. In my view, she appears to offer absolutely nothing in her own > > > persona, of spiritual substance that is impressive or appealing. > > > Maharishi, whether he has certain initiations or not, has a much > > > greater energy presence than your guru. Guru Dev [Swami Brahmananda > > > Saraswati] far surpasses them both. This is just my view. > > > > How long have you lived with any of the 3 Gurus that you just > > mentioned? I lived day and night with SwamiG, not the other 2. > > > I have no desire to spend any time with your guru. I've spent a > considerable amount of time with Maharishi on courses and teacher > training. I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily. > > > [snip] > > > > > Further, I don't think one can rely merely on what badges the boy > > > scout [or girl scout] has acquired or claims, but rather on his > > > character and the quality of the work he accomplishes. > > > > First step is see what peace comes about under the guidance of the > > Guru you are under. Swami G's General comments are that until one is > > realized, you are not going to save the world. One who can't even save > > himself is going to save the world? > > > I remain totally unimpressed. If you have found what you're looking > for, then good for you. Meanwhile, I recommend that you take your own > advice . . . > > "Are we about to step into nonsense here because if so it is going to > be very short lived from this side." > > . . . but recognise however, that that which appears to be nonsense > [compared to the import of Maharishi and Guru Dev] is coming from your > side.
Anyone can claim to be a Guru and a Swami from A to Z and back again forever if they wish to. Go ahead, thats fine with me, I could not care less. But in the case of this "Guru" who claims that no one can be enlightened or Teacher because he once was a secretary and dresses in white (!), well in this case I think the writer firmely has put him/herself on an intense level of nonsense rarely seen even here on FFL. Even Vaj, in his worst of moods, couldn't cook up such utter rubbish.
