--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And isn't enlightenment *itself* a McGuffin? We > pursue it doggedly, onepointedly, and when we find > it we find out that it's always been present, and > there was never anything to pursue.
Hmmmm, sounds like rationalization to me. Nothing personal, there's a lot of it going around.:-)You yourself have indicated many times that enlightenment comes and goes for you, so though it may be always present, you appear to lose it frequently, and therefore your perception of it is something you pursue. Is enlightenment a McGuffin? Yep- probably, because it is meaningless by itself.:-)
