--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > <shempmcgurk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The so-called rich pay almost all of the income taxes in this 
> > country.  
> > > In fact, the top 1% highest-earning Americans pay a whopping 
37% 
> > of all 
> > > individual income taxes collected.  The top 10% pay 67%.  In 
other 
> > > words, 10% of Americans pay two-thirds of the taxes.  Half of 
all 
> > > taxpayers – those in the bottom 50% of earnings – account for 
less 
> > than 
> > > 4% of income tax revenues.  This means no matter how taxes are 
> > cut, 
> > > it's nearly impossible for those cuts to primarily benefit 
lower-
> > > earning taxpayers.  Tax cuts necessarily benefit those who pay 
the 
> > > overwhelming bulk of the taxes.  This simple truth allows the 
left 
> > to 
> > > attack each and every tax cut proposal on the grounds that it 
> > > disproportionately benefits the rich.
> > > 
> > > Yet we have exactly the kind of steeply progressive tax system 
> > > championed by Karl Marx.
> > >
> > Look at the greatly disproportionate distribution of income in 
this 
> > country, and you may get a clue why "the Left" thinks "the 
Right" is 
> > so greedy. Or you can just keep lying with statistics. By the 
way, 
> > the top 10% own 70% of the wealth, so they damned well better 
pay 
> > 67% of the taxes. The top 1% own 33% of the wealth. That means 
each 
> > of the top one percent is worth about $15,000,000. :-)
> 
> I'm glad SoC and knowledge of economics are not correleated. Nor 
with
> logic. Or are they? hmmmm.
> 
I am absolutely positive you will learn more by turning your 
microscope elsewhere. As the cop says in the B-movie, "move along, 
nothing to see here citizens"...:-)

Reply via email to