Hey Geezer, Thanks for the voice of reason man. I hear ya bro. Richard is an odd one as his last reply to my post attests. I enjoyed writing my first response, but lost interest when he replied with the usual crazy making dance. I am pretty sure he can't help it.
Judy is a different story. There is no way that I can get her off the view that I am a devious person telling deliberate untruths for some nefarious end. As long as I stay detached from her odd accusations I usually enjoy the ride. But the truth is that I would much prefer an evening hanging out with you and your music collection! --- In [email protected], "geezerfreak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > Judy: > > > > > First, you should apologize for the bogus equation > > > you drew between what Jim said and what fundies/ > > > Catholics say about those who believe differently > > > going to hell, instead of dishonestly trying yet > > > again to evade accountability for it. > > > > Well at least I tried. I don't think we share the same perspective > > on your role here on FFL Judy. > > > Curtis, your posts are nearly always insightful and entertaining. Keep 'em coming. But trying > to have meaningful dialog with Judy or WillyTex is a waste of your valuable time IMO. Tex is > just nuts. Judy riffs endlessly (and circuitously) on a theme of smarmy condescension that > generally ends up (as it did this time) with her calling the person who disagrees with her > "dishonest" and a "liar". It's pathetic and boring. > > You've got way better things to do with all that talent than wasting time on either party. >
