--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "It was intellectually dishonest of you to pretend > this paragraph was the substance of the Wikipedia > entry. Here's the first paragraph:" > > OMG foiled again! How could I have known that you would be able to > find Wikipedia from my reference to it and get the whole article! > > So clever, so resourceful, and oh sooooo "clarificatory"! > > My nefarious ends are only delayed, not thwarted by your brilliant > tactic of following provided references. Now that I know this is > part of your skills I will cover my tracks much better.
All intellectually dishonest mockery, Curtis. > BTW some topics have more than one way to look at them other > then your way and the "intellectually dishonest way". Absolutely true. But each instance needs to be examined on its own terms.
