> > So it comes as no surprise how confused people can get. > > But in a previous post you denied that these were > > Nagarjuna's Four Negations. > > Judy wrote: > No, I didn't. > Yes you did.
And it comes as no surprise how confused people can get who don't have a clue what Nagarjuna was talking about and who have read too much Ken Wilber. Judy wrote: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/141611 They're phrased in many different ways, depending on the context; the point is, of course, conceptual and not intended to be a direct quotation from Nagarjuna. Judy wrote: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/118660 Brahman is not the relative. Brahman is not the Absolute. Brahman is not both the relative and the Absolute. Brahman is not neither the relative nor the Absolute. --Nagarjuna Judy wrote: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143126 But the answer to the question "What is samadhi like?" is still "It's like nothing."
