Bill wrote: > Found out he had little interest in it ... sniff. > TurqBnimble... > <Snort!>
> Unfortunately, it can't actually be the middle > of anything because it ends in negation. > Negation is the Middle Way between denial or affirmation; affirmation or denial is a position at the beginning or end, i.e. an extreme. > Shankara was quite accurate - from nothing you > only get nothing. > >From 'nothing' you get freedom from views, you avoid the thicket of views, you do not become entangled. >From 'nothing' you can think, and run, and jump, and use logic. >From 'something' you get a view, a tangled-up-in blue. > This is outrageous! You're telling me that Shankara > wrote a vivarana on Vyasa's commentary on Patanjali's > Yoga Sutras? And that the pundits on Usenet and FFL > withheld this information from me for nearly 10 years. > For what purpose, I wonder? This seems tyo be a pattern > with some TMer informants - withholding information. > > First, they wouldn't tell me the meaning of the bija > mantras, then they refused to tell me where all the > money was going, then they tried to hide the fact that > Marshy was having relations with his female students. > > Now I find out that Shankara wrote about the Yoga > Sutras and not a single respondent has a thing to > say about it. Some pundits they turned out to be. > This is the final straw with these punditsters. > > I can only conclude that they are devious, lying > soundrels, and intellectually dishonest. They've > confused Middle Way Buddhism with Adwaita Vedanta! > > There is no Being in God - the Transcendental Person > is an illusion, Brahman is a "nothing". And the > Marshy is a left-handed, tantric basket weaver. > > Go figure.
