--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > And given that now the vast majority of all TM research, > the basis of which was previously discredited by The Cambridge > Handbook of Consciousness
Not, for many reasons. has now been fully discredited (with a few passers, > probably unduplicatable) by a broad study of meditation research, > scientists aren't looking too favorably on the Reesh's specious > "Vedic science" claims. First, as you know, the studies are *modern* science, not "Vedic science." Second, you fail to mention that the article you refer to found that *all* the available research on meditation was of poor quality, not just that on TM. Considering the large number of studies the authors evaluated, that they didn't find *any* studies of good quality makes one wonder about the appropriateness of their criteria.
