TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You'd think the country was constantly under siege by Islamic
>> terrorists which it isn't and nowhere close. This nonsense is
>> totally unwarranted but their think tanks told them that when
>> the economic shit hits the fan there will be massive unrest in
>> this country (that is if the massive overweight can still walk
>> the few steps to the streets) so they are putting the tools in
>> place to control us.
>>
>
> The last thing I want to do is get involved in a
> bunch of US politics and conspiracy theories, but
> as long as you're doing it, I think you might want
> to aim your conspiracy theory a little less far
> into the future. Economic collapse, scholapse,
> dude...there is an *election* coming up, and elec-
> tion that the Republicons cannot possibly win. So
> do you think it's possible that a few of them are
> thinking, "Hmmmm...we can't win an election, so
> why don't we have a terrorist attack instead?
> Then we wouldn't have to *have* an election."
>
> That's the way we'd do a good conspiracy theory
> 'way over here in Europe. :-)
>
> And just in case things turn out that way, I just
> wanted to be on record as having said it first,
> *from* 'way over here in Europe. :-) :-) :-)
I whole heartedly agree and many of us here have been speculating on
that too. But it is easier to convince people given factual debt
problems of the US, the declining dollar, etc. that an economic collapse
could be what they are planning for. But anyway here is Webster Tarpley
(who has written books on this kind of thing) on your kind of conspiracy
theory from one of the top conspiracy sites on the web. :)
http://rense.com/general77/chens.htm
