--Right, but TALKING (or posting stuff on the internet) about Enlightenment is another "story". The Neo-Advaitins are saying their story is superior to the stories of others. Buddhism has an absolute continuum of existence, and doesn't get into such infantile games.
- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > Sure doesn't sound *anything* like moodmaking to me. :-) > > > > > > No doubt :-) But then, you still think enlightenment is an > > > experience > > > > No, not in the same way that eating an orange is an > > experience, but one's *stories* about enlightement > > and one's *interpretation* of enlightenment are > > *very much* experiences, and *very much* stories. > > Dual attention and the duality of language can never contain the > wholeness of nondual awareness. Words and stories will never be more > than the crudest of descriptions of that which is known on the level > of unbounded pure awareness. >
