TurquoiseB wrote:
> YES this is a silly nitpick.
>
So, you're saying that nitpicking is NOT against 
the rules by *your* standards.

> Uh, Judy...using your *own* standards, aren't
> you insinuating above that either Jim or MDixon
> used the phrase "stab in the back?" 
> 
> You put it in quotes, after all. AND, you did 
> so just after using quotes *fairly* "properly" 
> (that is, accprding to the rules in Judy Stein's 
> Big Book Of How To Write Gud) to *misquote* 
> MDixon, who really said "invested in *the* 
> failure," not "invested in failure." If you 
> were doing the quote properly, you should have 
> said "invested in ... failure," indicating with
> the elipses that you had left out one or more 
> words.
> 
> *By your own standards*, what you attributed to 
> MDixon was technically a misquote of what he 
> said. *By your own standards*, what you attributed 
> to someone -- either Jim or MDixon -- was a made-
> up quote of your own, something that neither of 
> them said or probably ever imagined.
> 
> If it had been *me* you were having this dis-
> cussion with, and I had done what you just did,
> you would have been screaming to high heaven right 
> now accusing me of maliciously claiming that you'd 
> said something you didn't. 
> 
> You would have put this down to my long-estab-
> lished disregard for truth and honesty, and to 
> my obvious malevolent intent towards you and my
> desire to portray you negatively here on FFL. 
> And then you would have whined for a couple of 
> more paragraphs, doing a smashing rendition of 
> the Poor Me Blues.
> 
> But it's *OK* when you do it. Right?
> 
> Rules of punctuation usage and rules of "argu-
> mentation ethics" are only for *other* people.
> They don't *apply* to you. Right?
> 
> And yes, for the others here who are rolling
> their eyes and thinking of Sal's song (nice work
> on that, Sal...more creativity and originality
> of thought in one post than Judy has displayed 
> in 13 years), YES this is a silly nitpick. It's 
> *insane* for me to claim that Judy meant to 
> attribute the phrase "stab in the back" to 
> either Jim or MDixon, just because she put it
> in quotes. 
> 
> So why isn't it insane when she claims the same
> thing about me and Vaj?
>


Reply via email to