[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 8/1/07 10:14:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I believe that because of the constitution, the military would > arrest them. The Generals would not accept it, especially as they > are in a quagmire they cannot get out of, are seriously stretched > for personnel, and are under-funded (not to mention the mess of > returning vets to poor facilities and waning funding for benefits > and care. > > This barely touches the tip of the iceberg the Bush-Cheney mess that > has been made and the generals will not accept this administration > much longer and will talk against their policies. (and if the > generals do not do this, the rest of the ranks will stand against > them in various undermining ways) > > OffWorld > > > > I'm sorry people. I wasn't going to post anymore this week since I have gone > over about 5, but I can't resist this. Nobody is going to cancel > elections.It's ridicules to even entertain the thought. And the moral of > soldiers in > Iraq under General Petreius is at an all time high right now, especially > since > the rules of engagement have changed more in the advantage of our soldiers. > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > > If you like war so much then why don't you go over and join them? BTW, how exactly do you measure victory in Iraq?
