Good ones. A few attempts to match your wits, an endeavor I am sure to fail in. (My being half-wit, half man)
M: I don't find your view and method that suitable for me. But I am glad it works for you. E: You are suffering and in deep denial. E: My new teacher said the mood is made of green cheese and if everyone ate that cheese , we would have world peace. M: Sounds interesting, but a bit implausible. Do you have any research to substantiate such a claim? E: Damn it, You are suffering and in deep denial. M: hmmm, I just don't see or experience it in that way. E: Why are you so angry? You need to resolve your anger , Damn it! M: Thats a perspective. E: Its THE perspective Buddy. Its straight from Brahman. M: Really? How does that work? E: I am Brahman, so what I say has the backing of the entire universe, manifest and unmanifest. M:How long has that been going on? E: Surrender to Me. Some day you will Get it its all about ME. Until then You are suffering and in deep denial. M: And you said you are omnicient? Can you tell me how string theory works and what its missing? E: Hey, how about dem Red Soxs! M: no, really, about string theory.. E: Hey, how about dem Red Soxs! M: You seem to be avoiding the question, If you are omnicient, it should be easy. Why can't you answer? E: Hey, how about dem Red Soxs! M: huh? E: You are suffering and in deep denial. --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Enlightened guys are just you and me with better PR and labels. > > E = Enlightened guy M = Me > > > E) My desires got fulfilled by my support of nature. > > M) I wanted something and I got it. > > E) My desire didn't happen because other people's deservability wasn't > high enough to support it. They should look to the purity of their lives. > > M) I didn't get what I wanted but I will try again. > > > > E) Do less accomplish more do nothing accomplish everything. > > M) Work smarter not harder. > > > > E) People's karma returned to them as bad events. > > M) S-- happens. > > > > E) My Self is the basis of the whole universe, I am eternal and > unbounded. > > M) I'm feeling good today. > > > > E) I could have anything I desire but my desires will only arise > according to the need of the time. > > M) I get some stuff I want and don't get some stuff, such is life. > > > > E) I don't make mistakes I only serve the needs of nature. > > M) I made a mistake, sorry. > > > > E) If anything I have done hurts you, it was your karma and will help > you advance in your evolution. > > M) If I hurt you, sorry, I can be a dumbass sometimes. > > > > E) The parking space opened up for me because of my sattvic life. The > means gather around my purity. > > M) Wow, a parking space opened up! > > > > E) When I drop my mortal coil I will live eternally as a drop returned > to the ocean, never to reincarnate again in the world of duality and > suffering. > > M) Anybody see the remote? Oh there it is! > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Great post Curtis. Peg Leg Sam -- a classic. (No relation to > > > Toothpick > > > > Sad Sam Jones I suppose -- (now thats an obscure reference)). > > > > > > > > Sort of reminds me of what I envision MMY or others might say when > > > > asked to fly. "I could, but I don't really like flying." > > > > > > > > Which brings me to Rory and Jim. Guys, I appreciate your responses. > > > > And I have understood them I think, and appreciate the views you > > > > expressed. But you didn't directly answer my question. Not that you > > > > are obligated to. > > > > > > > > Jim, you sort of implied an answer -- that you weres peeved at Bush > > > > and Iraq -- and this expressed disatisfaction might be an agent for > > > > change. Which implies, to me, your ability to fulfill desires > > > doesn't > > > > extend to big things like Iraq. So its a limited qualified type of > > > > desire fulfillment. > > > > > > I agree with what Rory said, > > > > Thats a surprise! MahaMe swallowing the particle MiniMe and each -- > > the one mind/body/mouth -- saying "sumptuous!" :) > > > > > > that the dissatisfaction found with the > > > war, is really some sort of resolution that needs to be resolved > > > within me. Which is not to say I will stop feeling what I am feeling > > > or doing what I am doing. I do agree with something else that Rory > > > has said, and that is that particles as he puts it (and it is a very > > > effective use of the word (lol)) don't necessarily want the things > > > that we want for them-- this goes for Curtis too when he makes his > > > rationalist arguments against fulfillment of desires. So though I > > > have opinions and express them and will call something out if it > > > needs to be changed, I can think of nothing in my existence that > > > needs to be changed so badly that my life is not whole without it. I > > > hope that answers your question.:-) > > > > Yes that is clearer, and more straightforward -- personally honest IMO > > -- than some other particles. :) > > > > Your statement -- amended -- appears to be, paraphrasing, "I get a lot > > of my personal desires fulfilled. But not all the big ones, global > > ones happen right away -- and its hard to tell what influence that I > > have on them. Still, each and every particle desiring a change towards > > greater happiness for other particles is certainly not > > counterproductive. And it may even help. But in large part, even when > > my desires are not fulfilled, it doesn't effect my happiness." > > > > I am not saying you should be saying that, but that is my sense of > > what you are saying. Or at least my personal takeaway -- the value it > > has induced in me. For me, thats a healthy appraoch, and yur post > > helped me frame it, for me. > > >
