TurquoiseB wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> A woman who was raised in the Illuminati cult describes a powerful >> secret organization comprising one per cent of the U.S. population >> that has infiltrated all social institutions and is covertly >> preparing a military takeover. Her revelations cast the "war on >> terror" and "homeland security" in their true light. >> "Svali" is the pseudonym of the woman, age 45, who was a >> mind "programmer" for the cult until 1996. She was the sixth head >> trainer in the San Diego branch and had 30 trainers reporting to >> her. >> She has risked her life to warn humanity of the Illuminati's covert >> power and agenda. >> She describes a sadistic Satanic cult led by the richest and most >> powerful people in the world. It is largely homosexual and >> pedophile, practises animal sacrifice and ritual murder. >> I'm trying for the 4th time today to post to this thread. For some reason Thunderbird thought the first message in it was Junk and maybe Yahoo is for the same reason rejecting my reply so we'll try off the second message in the thread. :-(
Regardless of what one thinks about such organizations like the "Illuminati" whether real or imagined I don't think the rich just let their affairs run random. There is planning and there are meetings of minds like the Bilderburg group, etc as well as the use of think tank reports. There are billions at stake. Unfortunately their decisions call them "strategies" or "conspiracies" can effect many if not all people in the world. There are people who have spent their lives making a study of this and much of their research is well founded. In the animal kingdom we see the little battles for superiority: who is going to be the leader of the pack. Man is no different though he can be more sophisticated. With man the "king of the hill" game was originally done physically which turned out to be pretty dangerous. Wiser "kings of the hill" started using psychology. One of their principal tools was religion. Tell the people if they killed someone they go to hell. That includes if they want to throw the king off the hill so the king was kept safe that is until someone called their bluff. Then the king had another problem when he wanted to throw a war on the neighboring king. If killing was bad what about the killing he was mandating for the war? So he modified his con a bit to say that killing in war was okay and you wouldn't go to hell. After a while these cons became more and more sophisticated. Tell the people everything an illusion so nothing matters. Hell if nothing matters if the bill collector is tearing down your door or a corrupt cop wants to beat the shit out of you for doing nothing. They found all kinds of diversions that kept the masses minds off their tyranny such as sports, theater and music. These days it has become so sophisticated that it includes TV and even spending hours a day on the Internet maybe even hanging out on FFL. Each of those hours is one less that you have for protesting tyranny unless you of course are using these mediums to do just that. So do the wealthy 1% think the rest of us are shit and deserve to die? Well how many of you have known anyone in the wealthier 1%? How about people from really old wealth? Some of the old wealth I have known though have been pretty liberal and championed social causes. But I have also known some pretty arrogant wealthy folks that definitely thought they were superior. How many of you have even thought yourself that most people are like pond scum, floating on the surface? After all Maharishi once even said the ignorant are a "drag on society." This can be construed as elitism unless your way of fixing the problem is to help pull the masses up out of the mess they're in. Of course there then is the problem that many of them may not want to be pulled out of their illusion. That also leads to a schism which some of the "so-called" conspiracy theorists like Webster G. Tarpley say exists in the wealthy ranks. Tarpley, a Princeton graduate, is a one of the well researched writer on this stuff. He says there is a rift right now between the George Schultz led group that controls the White House and the Zignev Brezinski group. I often post some articles on "so-called" conspiracies. This isn't for virus spreading though. I put those articles here for discussion and for the consideration of the group. Some because of their ego like to dismiss these to "look cool" without even doing any requisite research. I also think we are in for a world of hurt and this would be natural according to cycles of history. As a computer programmer I learned long ago to step back and take a look at the bigger picture to identify problems. Likewise one can do the same thing with world events. You tell me what you get when you do that looking at the Bush administration timeline?
