--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of shempmcgurk > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:02 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jerry Jarvis's disassociation from TM > org- > <snip> > > If I was: > > > > 1) getting a payoff for silence about having sex with someone; and > > > > 2) telling people (such as Rick Archer) that I was having sex with > > that particular person > > > > ...then, yes, I would most certainly keep IN A SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX > > AND HAVE DUPLICATES MADE of such checks. That would be, AT A > > MINIMUM, what I would do. > > > > What would a bunch of old check stubs prove? How would > > they differ from the check stubs thousands of other TM > > teachers would have if they had saved them? > > Somehow I doubt a hush-money check would come > with a stub attached suitable for later paper- > trailing. You could always make a photocopy > of the check itself before you deposited it, > but photocopies can be faked. >
One more thought on this: I'd love to hear from our resident attorney, Marek Reevis, what he thinks of this line of thinking. That is, what should be expected as minimal evidence from an accuser making such claims.
