--- In [email protected], gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'll claim the prize > > "The wobble induced on the star by each of these > planets is really tiny-it's just a few meters a > second." > > Where's the photo of the planet? All I see in the > article is the usual theory that if the star wobbles > then there just must be a planet, along with an > artist's rendition of what the "planet" might possibly > look like, along with a photograph of the star that > clearly proves today's telescopes are not capable of > showing anything more than a diffraction pattern when > it comes to resolving a star disk.
As I'm sure you know, we never really landed on the moon either.
