Ron,

without responding to each point you write below, please refer to my 
rather detailed response to Hugosomethingorother in which everything 
I write applies to you.

Summary? You were obviously off the program.  You didn't do TM 
properly.



--- In [email protected], "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, 
> 
> I will try to clarify. One Guru at a time- MMY was my Guru, I had 
no others while in TM. IN 
> the last months, I met my Guru on line- for those months, I was 
still practiciing TM, once I 
> took initiation with the new Guru, then this became the end of my 
formal TM practice.
> 
> The thing Gurus will recomend is to only have one. If a time comes 
for some reason where 
> you are ready to leave that Guru for another, then most Gurus would 
advise no different 
> than before, there should only be one Guru at a time
> 
> My Guru had 4 gurus, yet the most recent enlightened disciple only 
had Swami G and no 
> other. My Gurus comments are some may have many gurus, some only 
one. 
> 
> While in TM, I went very deep, there were times of only 
consciousness on it's own. In the 
> last 5 years, there was this bliss that carriered over in activity, 
but not just some slight 
> mundane bliss, really a significant deep bliss going for days at a 
time
> 
> Now, if this is not correct TM practice, what else do I have to 
give as a report? I had good 
> financial success through the years, this can also be attributed to 
TM. I can write a very 
> long list of benefits I had- how much time do you have?
> 
> I did yagyas, spending 30k one year once, went on courses, and by 
the way, I will be in 
> vlodrop in about 5 days-hahaha. I have even worked for a short time 
as staff in Vlodrop, 
> by some crazy happening was sitting in Maharishi's house for an 
hour, etc.
> 
> As a teacher, I didicated myself to various projects through the 
years, participated in most 
> of the major courses- India, Phillippines- had the gandarva music 
school in my house, 
> had loads of purusha staying in my house, was a natural law 
candidate, donated lots of 
> money to the movement, 
> 
> Others have done more and less- I am mentioning these things 
because who knows what 
> it is , if anything that may satisfy your inquirey about me doing 
TM correctly- I got an 
> idea- ask Rick or Peter what they think?
> 
> But it doesn't matter anyway, you are entitled to your opinion, and 
I guess the main thing 
> is not about me anyway, I have no complaints, if you are happy 
where you are, then go for 
> it. I am just giving you my opinion that it is possible to have 
more than one Guru and 
> possibly excell quickly in the journey, but that the gurus would 
not recomend haveing 
> more than one at a time. The when one has their Guru, it is 
recomended to go for it 100%.
> 
> As you may know, I further recomended that it should be 2 things, a 
sat Guru, and then 
> work one to one
> 
> 
> Tanmay
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > 
> > > There can be confusion with two Gurus.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I must conclude, therefore, that at one point in your life you 
> > accepted unto yourself Maharishi Mahesh Yogi as your guru, 
correct?
> > 
> > If you did that, Ron, you are aware, aren't you, that you were 
off 
> > the program (the TM Program, that is)? Gurus are NOT part of the 
TM 
> > Program.
> > 
> > With all due respect to you, you weren't therefore practising the 
TM 
> > Program properly (you may have been doing the TM Technique 
properly, 
> > but not the TM Program).
> > 
> > This is the recurrent theme I find with dozens of contributors 
here 
> > on FFL: disillusionment with MMY because of the way that he 
conducted 
> > himself as a guru!  Well, he may be a guru and you may have 
entered 
> > into that relationship with him but THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 
> > TM!!!!  That was because of some weakness in yourself that you 
> > abandoned a path (the TM Program) for one that involved a guru.
> > 
> > So, please, don't mix up your guru relationship with something 
that 
> > is totally separate because it confuses readers who then read 
into 
> > your dissatisfaction that it is the TM Program at fault when you 
> > weren't even practising it in the first place.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > So being under the guidance of my Guru, I am 
> > > willing to do the practices as instructed, and not mix 
anything, 
> > which is also an instruction 
> > > here. Sometimes I find myself with my TM mantra but it was not 
> > intentional, it just 
> > > happened- this shows the naturalness of TM meditation.
> > 
> > [snip]
> >
>


Reply via email to