--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sure you're right, Jim.  Who can know the future?, but I wasn't
> predicting so much as I was summing up a stance I have about the 
TMO.
>  If it's a slow news week, maybe Maharishi's death would make 
bigger
> headlines.  Or, if someone actually hovered, then all bets would be
> off.  Hell, I'd be a true believer again.
> 
> One thing about my post though is this:  I'm determined to try to 
take
> strong positions here to advance my own clarity.  I'm using a
> "technique" called "posting."  Certainly, I can and will be shot 
down
> many times more here, but I am proud that I'm trying hard to say 
true
> things even if that's theoretically impossible.  I don't hardly 
agree
> with anyone here about so many things, that this takes a lot of
> courage on my part to risk being a fool in front of experts.  
> 
> I said Vaj was full of blarney the other day -- his scholarship is 
so
> beyond my range, that I had to toss a brick at him just to lighten 
my
> depression that I'm so uninformed in so many ways.  Hee hee.
> 
> In case you need to hear it, I think you've helped me get a bit
> clearer on a few things too.  
> 
> Edg
> 
Hi, and thanks for your reply. As far as future predictions of 
Maharishi's place with regard to media attention, I think you are 
probably right-- a column or two, centered around the Beatles, et 
al. (and from my perspective, who the f*ck cares what is said in the 
popular press, right?). I was addressing a lot of the side comments 
that you and T made with regard to overall perspective on what MMY 
has done or not done, which of course are entirely subjective and 
due to each of your world views (and mine, should I comment on that 
topic) than anything he has actually done. 

I also agree that clarity on any number of topics is shared here 
through "posting", as you humorously put it. I find that posting not 
only improves my writing, long term, but is an excellent barometer 
and reflection of my ever expanding clarity and stability of 
unbounded awareness too.:-)

Reply via email to