--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All the below is my opinion. > > Judy, IMO, you're blasting me for the GREAT SIN of having had polite > conversations with Barry and thereby, IMO, you've decided that I'm to > be a target of yours. > > So, probably it's no surprise to anyone here that you've played your > same ol' same ol' card, nor will it surprise anyone, IMO, that since I > didn't sing your praises for your hating of Turq, that now, yep, I'm a > bad guy too. The word "hating" is my opinion, but maybe I should just > ask you straight out: do you hate Turq? If not, what is the emotion > you're having that promotes such obsessive counter punching? It sure > ain't any form of "tough love." It sure ain't sattvic. If Turq is > the loser you seem to think he is, well, then he's so lost, so > out-of-it, that shame on you for picking on the insane. If you are > attacking him like you do and if you are thinking he's not insane, > then you must be thinking he's evil -- worthy of hating. If you're > thinking that the word "evil" is "okay" then, you really are in > trouble to be projecting such. > > IMO, you've been wanting a chance to really lay into me; in fact, IT > SEEMS for some time now you've festered. So don't be coy; be the hag > that IMO you seem to want to be. If you are a hag, show your true > face here -- the photograph that I've seen of "you" here online is > wrinkled with, IMO, angst-plowed troughs in blotched skin -- a face of > simmering hate brought on by endless grimacing that I seem to "see" > daily worn by you here. > > If you continue to attack me, I will be inspired to disclose what, > IMO, is your "general ugliness," and I'm betting that I will find and > cite post after post of yours that plainly shows stupidity, > mean-heartedness, egoic attachment to falsities, failed spirituality, > general all around low esteem, a self image of inconsequentiality, and > deep fears such as "I'm an old woman seeing death around the corner, > and all I can do is strike out at others in blind panic." > > After all, I've seen what was purported to be your photograph, and if > that wasn't you, well, it sure seemed to be a good match for the > spiritual degredation that you've shown here. "Your" photograph, IMO, > is reason enough for you to change your name and stop posting anywhere > on the Internet. IMO, you must have not had any love in your life for > at least a decade -- given the sad, depressed countenance that I think > was plainly showing in "your" photograph. I've seen similar faces > sitting in the "day rooms" of the mental hospitals where I gave first > lectures. If you are insane, of course, then I pity you and take back > any assertions or opinions of "mindful evil" on your part. Seems > mindful to me though. And, if mindful, then you're up for the "Skank > of Fairfield Life" award. > > For all your intelligence and perceptiveness, IMO, you're stupid and > blind in your angry obsessions. > > Now, trot out your naughty words about me again; call me a liar or > fuckhead if you want to. It'll be like you are my creative writing > instructor telling me what essay I should next write about "The > Sagging Jowled Spewer of Tamas." Those who've known you in so many of > your online incarnations can fill me in perhaps, and I'll just love > putting those stories into my own words. Funzies! > > All of the above is MY OPINION about your inner and outer moral and > spiritual worth. In a word, decrepitude. > > Turn about's fair play; how's it working for you? > > Want more? Got tons, just ask. > > Edg
Yoiks! What an insecure nutjob.
