--- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Judy will never realize that what others take as meaningless > inconsistencies are for her great conquests to be strutted out into > the collesium.
Lurk, think about this for a minute: If the inconsistencies I pointed out in Barry's various versions of his tale about Charlie Lutes are "meaningless," why do you think he went ballistic when I called attention to them? Why did he decide to make an "exception" to his current policy of not responding to my posts? Why did he attempt a detailed, lengthy, point-by- point rebuttal, claiming (falsely) that I had deliberately distorted the context? How come Barry doesn't think the inconsistencies are meaningless?
