snip "In any case, if you're an ethical professional, you > don't put people down in front of their peers"...snip
Peer: 1. a person of the same legal status: a jury of one's peers. 2. a person who is equal to another in abilities, qualifications, age, background, and social status. 3. something of equal worth or quality: a sky-scraper without peer. 4. a nobleman. 5. a member of any of the five degrees of the nobility in Great Britain and Ireland (duke, marquis, earl, viscount, and baron). 6. Archaic. a companion. Should I be addressing you as the Marquis de Judy? I'm not feeling any of the first four definitions here with Viscount Willytex. --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "emptybill" <emptybill@> wrote: > > > > It is amazing what outrages are expressed on this forum in > > mindless, knee-jerk judgments. Peter made a casual, facetious > > remark > > And oh, BTW: > > "Dude, WITH ALL RESPECT, you need to be back on your > Seroquel. I KID YOU NOT. You have symptoms of a mild > psychosis." (my emphasis) > > > followed by more of the same > > "We didn't 'get' what he said because, at times, his > posts approach psychotic ramblings with bizarre > associations." > > His remarks may have been casual, but he sure didn't > make any effort to clue us in that they were > facetious--rather to the contrary. > > In any case, if you're an ethical professional, you > don't put people down in front of their peers by > making comments, facetious or otherwise, about the > state of their mental health. >
